Federal Laws Essay -- essays papers

Federal Laws The federal directments nucleotide on inclusion is somewhat indistinct. on that point are federal laws that govern education of children with disabilities. However, they do not require inclusion, but only that a significant effort be made to find an inclusive placement. The Individuals With Disabilities rearing Act (IDEA) was amended in 1997. The term inclusion does not look in the act, but does require that children with disabilities be educated to the maximum consummation appropriate in the least restrictive environment, which is interpreted to mean the habitue education classroom. The intent of IDEA is to educate as many students with disabilities as possible in the regular education classroom (--, 2002.) Section 504 of the reformation Act of 1973 requires that all recipients of federal funds must house compeer education of each qualified handicapped child in its legal power with people who are not handicapped. Those schools that receive federal fundin g must place the handicapped child in the regular education classroom unless it is demonstrated by the recipient that this type of education with the added use of supplemental aides and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily (Schultz 2001.) Court Cases Court decisions provide guidelines governing placement of the child with special needs under IDEA. There are many court cases throughout the country involving challenges to placement of students in the least restrictive environment. In the case of Greer vs. Rome City instruct District in 1992 parents were fighting against the placement of their daughter in a self-contained special education classroom. The district argued that the costs of providing services in the classroom would be too high. The court ... ...d States of America Pearson Education Group, Inc. Barry, Janet & Wise, B.J. (1997). refueling inclusion through technology Students with disabilities can rise to new senior high with assertive technology Hornby, G. (1999). Inclusion or delusion Can iodin size fit all? Support for Learning 14 (4), p.152 Jones, M. Thorn, C., Chow, P., & Wild, C. (2002). Equifinality Parents and students attitudes towards a student-centered approach to integration. Education 122 (3), p.624 Norwich, B. (2002). Education, inclusion and individual differences Recognizing and resolving dilemmas. British journal of Educational Studies50 (4), p.482 Perkins-Gough, D. (2003). Teaching all students. Educational Leadership 61 (2), p.92 Pi v ik, J., McComas, J., & Laflamme, M. (2002). Barriers and facilitators to inclusive education. Exceptional Children 69 (1), p.97