.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Teaching of Morals in Public Schools :: Free Essays Online

From the age of five until the time they graduate in their eighteenth year the barbarianren of America argon compelled to flow give instruction. Everyone agrees that we need compulsory education, but no one re whollyy agrees why our children need it. Some, like Jonathan Kozol, feel that the purpose of education is to turn a child into a good person by a series of moral and ethical lessons. The other school of thought is that school is a place for a general education of facts and figures and that morals go through no business in the classroom. This is a interrogatory of vital importance beca hire, with the vast majority of American youths in public school, it could truly change the hardiness of America.The first twenty geezerhood of a human beings life have more to do with making up who they ar than genetics and the other fifty-odd years of their life combined. Because of this there is a definite need for children and young adults to have a forum to let on more or less mora ls and ethics. In this respect Jonathan Kozols ideas from The nighttime is Dark and I am Far from Home are true, but, is the right place for a child to learn ethics a public school of the United States? An individuals moral beliefs are one of the most personal and complex pieces of his/her psyche. One must deal with the question of whether or not they want this nations youths to all be taught the same morals. If teachers were able to impose their own personal beliefs while teaching history and English, imagine what they could do to impressionable minds while teaching ethics. at that place is absolutely no way to teach morals objectively. If a teacher were a Christian fundamentalist, could she ( I, like Kozol, use she because a majority of elementary teachers are female) help a student make an informed, unbiased decision about miscarriage? If that teacher had to teach a child to make up his or her own mind, or if that teacher had to tell the student to be pro-choice (the law of the nation) she would be teaching something she didnt believe. The abortion example brings up the question, Whose morals are we going to teach our youth? If you allow a class in ethics, whose do you teach? The teachers, the schoolboards, or the nations? Whose ever so morals you do teach them would in all probability be drastically different from what they would come up themselves or what their parents would teach them.Teaching of Morals in macrocosm Schools Free Essays OnlineFrom the age of five until the time they graduate in their eighteenth year the children of America are compelled to attend school. Everyone agrees that we need compulsory education, but no one really agrees why our children need it. Some, like Jonathan Kozol, feel that the purpose of education is to turn a child into a good person through a series of moral and ethical lessons. The other school of thought is that school is a place for a general education of facts and figures and that morals have no business in the classroom. This is a question of vital importance because, with the vast majority of American youths in public school, it could truly change the face of America.The first twenty years of a human beings life have more to do with making up who they are than genetics and the other fifty-odd years of their life combined. Because of this there is a definite need for children and young adults to have a forum to learn about morals and ethics. In this respect Jonathan Kozols ideas from The Night is Dark and I am Far from Home are true, but, is the right place for a child to learn ethics a public school of the United States? An individuals moral beliefs are one of the most personal and complex pieces of his/her psyche. One must deal with the question of whether or not they want this nations youths to all be taught the same morals. If teachers were able to impose their own personal beliefs while teaching history and English, imagine what they could do to impressionable minds while teachi ng ethics. There is absolutely no way to teach morals objectively. If a teacher were a Christian fundamentalist, could she ( I, like Kozol, use she because a majority of elementary teachers are female) help a student make an informed, unbiased decision about abortion? If that teacher had to teach a child to make up his or her own mind, or if that teacher had to tell the student to be pro-choice (the law of the nation) she would be teaching something she didnt believe. The abortion example brings up the question, Whose morals are we going to teach our youth? If you allow a class in ethics, whose do you teach? The teachers, the schoolboards, or the nations? Whose ever morals you do teach them would probably be drastically different from what they would come up themselves or what their parents would teach them.

No comments:

Post a Comment