Accepting an Expert Claim

Accepting an Expert ClaimArgumentExperts argon individuals or governings proved to be quite knowledgeable and have dictum in a particular knit stitch. Most organizations prefer hiring and consulting experts in contrary skills and service actors line. However, this does not guarantee a perfect result for the organization or the company, as many factors may affect the service delivery by the experts. In such(prenominal) cases, the experts are bound to perform against the expectations. air organizations explore various methods of making conclusivenesss that implement line of reasoning operations. In this work, an arguing is based on the come uping. This paper presents an argument ab place the expert rent in making decisions. In particular, the paper seeks to explain the rationality of accept an expert claim in an event that the expert turn out to be err singleous.It is unreasonable to accept the expert claims without evaluating and examining such claims. Although experts are believed to be more knowledgeable in their areas of specialization, any person assigning duties by the expert remains accountable for their actions. In trading, leader plays a large role in making business decisions which are more effective. For a business to succeed, it relies upon the decisions made by its leaders. Attaining skills in making effective decisions requires intuition, tuition and experience. According to Reynolds (2011), effective decisions should be interpreted, explained, evaluated and study before being executed. to begin with accepting a claim from the expert, the claim should also be examined, analyzed and evaluate properly. Without paying attention to the above process, there is a happen of one facing the consequences of claim taken.Nevertheless, decision making in business involves the following steps. First is the identification of the problem. A specific problem must(prenominal) be revealed before attending to it. Identifying a specific problem enables one to identify a way of solving it. Secondly, the possible solutions for the problem should be well analyzed. This gives a wider range of options that can be considered. In accomplishing this, the decision maintainr impart be able to compare the risks and consider a solution with the lowest risk. Accepting the claims from the experts without considering the risks and the alternatives is unreasonable. The third step is evaluating the probabilities closer to achieving the goal. At this stage, the decision maker can evaluate if the possible solution selected will assist in achieving the right decision. The forth step is making the existing decision (Hew Cheung, 2014). The decision is therefore made having considered many factors therefore, failure to follow this reasonable process in making business decisions, errors are addicted to occur.Business decision making should be a collaborative component that necessitate the contribution of the concerned parties. Experts in a specif ic field are to be consulted on the best way of executing a function. However, some experts may not be experienced enough to fulfill the requirements of a given task. Upon involving the experts in decision making, proper evaluation, examination and depth psychology should be done before a solution is adopted.Furthermore, no affaire the position in an organization, each person is accountable his or her decisions. mentation is a skill that is not naturally endowed but needs to be practiced (Ennis, 2015), and it is the responsibility of everyone to train his/her mind to think critically, and make sound decisions. Reasoning describes ones capacity to think rationally, and making the right business decisions require rational thinking. It is unreasonable enough to take in the opinions from the experts without examining such opinions through rational and critical thinking.ReferencesEnnis, R. H. (2015). Critical thinking A satiny conception. In The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher educational activity (pp. 31-47). Palgrave Macmillan US.Hew, K. F., Cheung, W. S. (2014). Improving Social Studies Students Critical Thinking. In Using Blended development (pp. 59-78). Springer Singapore.Reynolds, Martin (2011). Critical thinking and systems were thinking towards a critical literacy for systems thinking in practice. In Horvath, Christopher P. and Forte, James M. eds. Critical Thinking. New York, USA Nova scientific discipline Publishers, pp. 37-68.