Value of Learning and the Number of Bucks

College is a time to broaden your program line and develop your skills. Different race go to college for different reasons but nighly for an education. The National Athletic familiarity is meeting next year and will decide if it needs to qualifying its policy of not commiting college athletes. I do not conceive why this should be an issue. The main reason people go to college is to learn. So the NCAA will be deciding whether the athletes should be salaried for playing their lark of choice thus demeaning the reason they atomic number 18 at college in the first place.There ar millions of pupils who go to college each year few play sports, others are in student government, and some are in theater. Each group is equ bothy important to the college and in some cases are treated the same. If the athletes start being paid for playing sports then whats going to stop the other students from finding a way to be paid for what they do. Does this mean then that students in student gov ernment should be paid for what they do or that the theater students should be allowed to join an rectitude theater union and be paid for doing shows? Paying athletes will make up a rivalry among the students, for why should one group be paid for going to college while the others are not.The other thing to look at is that most student athletes are receiving scholarship and grant support from their college. volume of the money that athletics being in is given back to the students by grants and scholarships. At Notre Dame, for example, grants-in-aid to student-athletes are worth(predicate) about $5 million annually. provide to that the millions spent on travel, housing, equipment, health care and other costs and graceful soon youre talking real money. So yes, while athletics does father millions of dollars in revenue for universities, there also are millions of dollars in expenses, most of which directly or indirectly assist the student-athletes. Sometime scholarships and gran ts are not enough which is why the NCAA recently passed legislation allowing student-athletes to work year-round. In addition, Pell Grants are available to the truly needy, and general student loans are another alternative. With all these options available, there shouldnt be a need to pay student athletes.Whats awful about the persistent whine for money is, its saying a college education is worthless. People are suggesting that the value of learning can altogether be measured by the almighty buck. Paying students will attribute too much emphasizes on sports and not enough on education. An education is priceless, and student-athletes at American colleges and universities reap the benefits of the finest higher education system in the world. From their education, students can go on in life and do what they demand because they have the drive and education to.Student-athletes entertain us with their special skills and, in compensation, receive all expenses paid competition in the spor ts they love, education that is worth thousands of real dollars with the promise of thousands more in future earnings, and the lifetime benefits of knowledge and character that come with being educated men and women. If we decide to pay college athletes, the only thing we accomplish is to move the universities further away from their verbalize ideals by making them more businesslike and disrupting the main point of college to learn.